Do you allow silly or absurd character names in your games?Why do I ask? Well, I think if your campaign has a particular theme or style, nothing breaks the theme or style like a silly name.
The kingdom is in peril. Anglarth the Black Dragon is at the gates. The tome of Arl-an-Uuthark must be opened. The sword of Tor Azul must be reforged.
Can you save us, Eye-Pad McRib San-Witch?See what I mean?
In the Rythlondar Chronicle, it seems like the PCs didn't even have names (caveat - I haven't read the whole thing yet), but the NPCs do. Of course, this is very early in our hobby's history.
I actually think this might be preferable to silly names.
I know that when I played Wizardry, I *tried* to come up with a clever, somewhat silly name. Of course, you are playing against the computer in this case. Basically, you use a silly name to amuse yourself. One of friends came up with one of the all-time best Wizardry character names (in my opinion)
Sir LoinsteakIn my games, I like the PCs to (eventually) have realistic sounding names. I don't rush the process. For a session or two, players might refer to their characters by their class.
In my Queston Campaign, I used HyperCard (years ago) to create a stack that randomly generated names for each fantasy race in play.
First names were made from an assortment of sounds (you might loosely call them phonemes) that were randomized and assembled by the program.
Last names were made from two-word combinations (in most instances)
Since these were computer generated, you could still get some silly results. I made up for this by generating hundreds of names and then allowing the player to mix and match. It seemed to work pretty well.
Here's a scan of a page of names from my "Questoni Book of Names"
Now, of course, with the internet you can find many random generators out there. My favorites are here. Special nod to this name generator which I like a great deal.
So, do you allow silly names at your table?